Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

2 models compared

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Intelligence

Apodex 1.1
26.4
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Best: 26.5

Coding

Apodex 1.1
60.8
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
—

Agentic

Apodex 1.1
28.4
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
—

Speed

Apodex 1.1
—
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
193 t/s

TTFT

Apodex 1.1
—
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
0.88 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Apodex 1.1
$0.30×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Best: $0.25

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Apodex 1.1
$3×4.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Best: $0.65

Context window

Apodex 1.1
256K
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Best: 1M

Reasoning

Apodex 1.1
Yes
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Yes

Open weights

Apodex 1.1
No
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Yes

Cost / task

Apodex 1.1
$0.464×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Best: $0.303

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Intelligence Indexmost efficient ↗Cost per task
  • Apodex 1.126.4 · $0.464
  • Nemotron 3.5 Super VL26.5 · $0.303

Preferences and analytics

Rybbit: visits, performance, clicks, copies, forms and session replay (masked inputs), with your permission. Refusing does not limit the site.

Privacy

Allow navigation analytics?

With your permission, Rybbit measures visits, performance and interactions (clicks, copies, forms), including session replay, to improve BenchSift. Input values are masked in replays. Refusing does not limit the site.

Your choice is stored for 180 days. Change it at any time using “Privacy preferences” in the footer. Withdrawal reloads the page.

No choice stored: Rybbit is disabled.

Privacy