Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Apodex 1.1
Apodex
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Apodex 1.1 Apodex	Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High) Anthropic
Intelligence	26.4	26.4
Coding	60.8	—
Agentic	28.4	—
Speed	—	45.7 t/s
TTFT	—	2.42 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.30	$5×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $3	$25×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	256K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$0.464	—

Intelligence

Apodex 1.1: 26.4
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): 26.4

Coding

Apodex 1.1: 60.8
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): —

Agentic

Apodex 1.1: 28.4
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): —

Speed

Apodex 1.1: —
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): 45.7 t/s

TTFT

Apodex 1.1: —
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): 2.42 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Apodex 1.1: Best: $0.30
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): $5×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Apodex 1.1: Best: $3
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): $25×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Apodex 1.1: 256K
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): Best: 1M

Reasoning

Apodex 1.1: Yes
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): No

Open weights

Apodex 1.1: No
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): No

Cost / task

Apodex 1.1: $0.464
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Apodex 1.126.4 · $0.975
Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)26.4 · $10